↓ Skip to main content

ACMT Position Statement: Interpretation of Urine for Tetrahydrocannabinol Metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Toxicology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
ACMT Position Statement: Interpretation of Urine for Tetrahydrocannabinol Metabolites
Published in
Journal of Medical Toxicology, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s13181-019-00753-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Connors, Michael J. Kosnett, Ken Kulig, Lewis S. Nelson, Andrew I. Stolbach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,503,179
of 14,346,974 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#342
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,219
of 193,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,974 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.