↓ Skip to main content

The challenge of combining variable retention and prescribed burning in Finland

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
The challenge of combining variable retention and prescribed burning in Finland
Published in
Ecological Processes, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0207-3
Authors

Henrik Lindberg, Pekka Punttila, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#11,356,944
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#75
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,539
of 278,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.