↓ Skip to main content

Flyway evolution is too fast to be explained by the modern synthesis: proposals for an ‘extended’ evolutionary research agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Flyway evolution is too fast to be explained by the modern synthesis: proposals for an ‘extended’ evolutionary research agenda
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10336-011-0716-z
Authors

Theunis Piersma

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 7%
Mexico 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 63 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 37%
Researcher 18 25%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 73%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,588,979
of 8,261,086 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#239
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,087
of 273,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,261,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.