↓ Skip to main content

Application of artificial neural networks for automated analysis of cystoscopic images: a review of the current status and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Application of artificial neural networks for automated analysis of cystoscopic images: a review of the current status and future prospects
Published in
World Journal of Urology, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00345-019-03059-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misgana Negassi, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola, Simon Hein, Arkadiusz Miernik, Alexander Reiterer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,190,248
of 14,242,710 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#730
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,630
of 256,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#26
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,242,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.