| Title |
Bio-economic modeling of fishing activities in Kenya: the case of Lake Naivasha Ramsar site
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioeconomics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10818-019-09292-2 |
| Authors |
B. N. Obegi, I. Sarfo, G. N. Morara, P. Boera, E. Waithaka, A. Mutie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,595,621
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioeconomics
#79
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,193
of 455,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioeconomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them