| Title |
The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education Trial: a Cluster Randomized Trial Addressing Health Communication in Diabetes Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05617-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard O. White, Rosette James Chakkalakal, Kenneth A. Wallston, Kathleen Wolff, Becky Gregory, Dianne Davis, David Schlundt, Karen M. Trochez, Shari Barto, Laura A. Harris, Aihua Bian, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Sunil Kripalani, Russell L. Rothman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,376,502
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,885
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,166
of 462,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#109
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.