↓ Skip to main content

The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education Trial: a Cluster Randomized Trial Addressing Health Communication in Diabetes Care

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education Trial: a Cluster Randomized Trial Addressing Health Communication in Diabetes Care
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05617-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard O. White, Rosette James Chakkalakal, Kenneth A. Wallston, Kathleen Wolff, Becky Gregory, Dianne Davis, David Schlundt, Karen M. Trochez, Shari Barto, Laura A. Harris, Aihua Bian, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Sunil Kripalani, Russell L. Rothman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,285,365
of 14,376,314 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,559
of 5,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,044
of 297,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#112
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,376,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.