↓ Skip to main content

Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Criminology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
Title
Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment
Published in
Journal of Experimental Criminology, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11292-019-09401-1
Authors

David Weisburd, Charlotte Gill, Alese Wooditch, William Barritt, Jody Murphy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,108,127
of 14,376,223 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#66
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,888
of 299,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,376,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.