↓ Skip to main content

Multi-criteria decision model for the selection and location of temporary shelters in disaster management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Multi-criteria decision model for the selection and location of temporary shelters in disaster management
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41018-019-0061-z
Authors

Manuela Marques Lalane Nappi, Vanessa Nappi, João Carlos Souza

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 35%
Decision Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,119,264
of 16,578,007 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#62
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,488
of 383,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,578,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.