↓ Skip to main content

Experiences and needs of patients with incurable cancer regarding advance care planning: results from a national cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
Title
Experiences and needs of patients with incurable cancer regarding advance care planning: results from a national cross-sectional survey
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00520-019-05285-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariken E. Stegmann, Olaf P. Geerse, Dorien Tange, Carol Richel, Linda Brom, Vivian Engelen, Saskia F. A. Duijts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,212,173
of 14,259,275 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#203
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,357
of 271,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#11
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.