↓ Skip to main content

Political consequences of conspiratorial thinking: evidence from 2016 Italian constitutional referendum

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Politica, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Political consequences of conspiratorial thinking: evidence from 2016 Italian constitutional referendum
Published in
Acta Politica, January 2020
DOI 10.1057/s41269-019-00146-3
Authors

Moreno Mancosu, Riccardo Ladini, Salvatore Vassallo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,924,300
of 14,242,710 outputs
Outputs from Acta Politica
#125
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,178
of 265,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Politica
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,242,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.