↓ Skip to main content

The clinical consequences of sucrase-isomaltase deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
The clinical consequences of sucrase-isomaltase deficiency
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40348-015-0028-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley A. Cohen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 8 14%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,009,914
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
#6
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,373
of 398,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.