↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Diabetes Management Among US Adults: 1999–2016

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Trends in Diabetes Management Among US Adults: 1999–2016
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05587-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Fang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,272,644
of 14,353,628 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,549
of 5,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,026
of 299,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#108
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,353,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.