↓ Skip to main content

Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip J. van der Wees, Eva W. Verkerk, Marjolein E. A. Verbiest, Marloes Zuidgeest, Carla Bakker, Jozé Braspenning, Dolf de Boer, Caroline B. Terwee, Ildikó Vajda, Anna Beurskens, Simone A. van Dulmen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Unspecified 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Social Sciences 17 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Unspecified 12 10%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,700,704
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#58
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,848
of 457,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.