↓ Skip to main content

Buying efficiency: optimal hospital payment in the presence of double upcoding

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Buying efficiency: optimal hospital payment in the presence of double upcoding
Published in
Health Economics Review, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13561-019-0256-4
Authors

Simon B. Spika, Peter Zweifel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,553,094
of 14,207,529 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#143
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,015
of 256,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,207,529 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.