↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET–CT performance standards

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Physics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET–CT performance standards
Published in
EJNMMI Physics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40658-019-0257-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Kaalep, Coreline N. Burggraaff, Simone Pieplenbosch, Eline E. Verwer, Terez Sera, Josee Zijlstra, Otto S. Hoekstra, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Ronald Boellaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Physics and Astronomy 6 11%
Engineering 6 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,165,138
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#61
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,328
of 458,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.