↓ Skip to main content

You sound familiar: carrion crows can differentiate between the calls of known and unknown heterospecifics

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
You sound familiar: carrion crows can differentiate between the calls of known and unknown heterospecifics
Published in
Animal Cognition, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0508-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia A. F. Wascher, Georgine Szipl, Markus Boeckle, Anna Wilkinson

Abstract

In group-living animals, it is adaptive to recognize conspecifics on the basis of familiarity or group membership as it allows association with preferred social partners and avoidance of competitors. However, animals do not only associate with conspecifics but also with heterospecifics, for example in mixed-species flocks. Consequently, between-species recognition, based either on familiarity or even individual recognition, is likely to be beneficial. The extent to which animals can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar heterospecifics is currently unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of eight carrion crows to differentiate between the voices and calls of familiar and unfamiliar humans and jackdaws. The crows responded significantly more often to unfamiliar than familiar human playbacks and, conversely, responded more to familiar than unfamiliar jackdaw calls. Our results provide the first evidence that birds can discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar heterospecific individuals using auditory stimuli.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
Hungary 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 92 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 31%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 14 14%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 66%
Unspecified 14 14%
Psychology 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#500,915
of 12,240,276 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#152
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,017
of 114,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,240,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them