↓ Skip to main content

Fault model of the 2012 doublet earthquake, near the up-dip end of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, based on a near-field tsunami: implications for intraplate stress state

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Fault model of the 2012 doublet earthquake, near the up-dip end of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, based on a near-field tsunami: implications for intraplate stress state
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40645-019-0313-y
Authors

Tatsuya Kubota, Ryota Hino, Daisuke Inazu, Syuichi Suzuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 59%
Engineering 3 18%
Computer Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,281,372
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#111
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,090
of 479,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.