↓ Skip to main content

Fault model of the 2012 doublet earthquake, near the up-dip end of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, based on a near-field tsunami: implications for intraplate stress state

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Fault model of the 2012 doublet earthquake, near the up-dip end of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, based on a near-field tsunami: implications for intraplate stress state
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40645-019-0313-y
Authors

Tatsuya Kubota, Ryota Hino, Daisuke Inazu, Syuichi Suzuki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 71%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,171,728
of 21,446,675 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#67
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,132
of 425,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#6
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,446,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.