↓ Skip to main content

Base-pair ambiguity and the kinetics of RNA folding

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform
Title
Base-pair ambiguity and the kinetics of RNA folding
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-3303-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangyao Zhou, Jackson Loper, Stuart Geman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,141,400
of 14,156,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,212
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,757
of 285,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#350
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,156,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.