↓ Skip to main content

Oligomers, fact or artefact? SDS-PAGE induces dimerization of β-amyloid in human brain samples

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Oligomers, fact or artefact? SDS-PAGE induces dimerization of β-amyloid in human brain samples
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1083-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Watt, Keyla A. Perez, Alan Rembach, Nicki A. Sherrat, Lin Wai Hung, Timothy Johanssen, Catriona A. McLean, Woan Mei Kok, Craig A. Hutton, Michelle Fodero-Tavoletti, Colin L. Masters, Victor L. Villemagne, Kevin J. Barnham

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Chemistry 8 9%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,054,228
of 7,659,635 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#252
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,604
of 266,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,659,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.