↓ Skip to main content

Stochasticity in Sexual Selection Enables Divergence: Implications for Moth Pheromone Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Stochasticity in Sexual Selection Enables Divergence: Implications for Moth Pheromone Evolution
Published in
Evolutionary Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9176-5
Authors

Elizabeth L. Bergen, Jonathan T. Rowell, Fred Gould, Maria R. Servedio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Japan 1 3%
France 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 25 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 90%
Unspecified 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,476,491
of 9,688,534 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#155
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,947
of 100,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,688,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.