↓ Skip to main content

The causal mechanism of migration behaviors of African immigrants in Guangzhou: from the perspective of cumulative causation theory

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Chinese Sociology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The causal mechanism of migration behaviors of African immigrants in Guangzhou: from the perspective of cumulative causation theory
Published in
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40711-014-0002-6
Authors

Yucheng Liang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 33%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,722,814
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#27
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,629
of 260,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them