↓ Skip to main content

Influence of lung aeration on diaphragmatic contractility during a spontaneous breathing trial: an ultrasound study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Influence of lung aeration on diaphragmatic contractility during a spontaneous breathing trial: an ultrasound study
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40560-019-0409-x
Authors

Jing Xia, Chuan-Yun Qian, Li Yang, Mei-Ju Li, Xiao-Xue Liu, Ting Yang, Qin Lu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,115,839
of 14,110,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#208
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,514
of 269,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,335 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.