↓ Skip to main content

Highly efficient CRISPR-targeting of the murine Hipp11 intergenic region supports inducible human transgene expression

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Highly efficient CRISPR-targeting of the murine Hipp11 intergenic region supports inducible human transgene expression
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11033-019-05204-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Browning, Michael Rooney, Emily Hams, Satoru Takahashi, Seiya Mizuno, Fumihiro Sugiyama, Padraic G. Fallon, Vincent P. Kelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,412,545
of 14,354,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#409
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,754
of 320,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#8
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,354,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.