↓ Skip to main content

Investigation on geothermal binary-flashing cycle employing zeotropic mixtures as working fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Investigation on geothermal binary-flashing cycle employing zeotropic mixtures as working fluids
Published in
Geothermal Energy, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40517-019-0153-4
Authors

Lingbao Wang, Xianbiao Bu, Huashan Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 25%
Energy 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,703,173
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#112
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,154
of 459,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.