↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: The second international workshop on health natural language processing (HealthNLP 2019)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Editorial: The second international workshop on health natural language processing (HealthNLP 2019)
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0930-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanshan Wang, Hua Xu, Ozlem Uzuner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,464,241
of 14,093,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,228
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,647
of 265,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#123
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.