↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal Non-compacted Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Poor Outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Neonatal Non-compacted Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Poor Outcome
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00246-019-02241-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul, Sheila Tubio-Gómez, Juan Manuel Carretero Bellón, Carles Bautista-Rodríguez, Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,484,443
of 14,093,691 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#318
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,887
of 265,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.