↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of AGREE and RIGHT: which Clinical Practice Guideline Reporting Checklist Should Be Followed by Guideline Developers?

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
A Comparison of AGREE and RIGHT: which Clinical Practice Guideline Reporting Checklist Should Be Followed by Guideline Developers?
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05508-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaomei Yao, Jinhui Ma, Qi Wang, David Kanters, Muhammad U. Ali, Ivan D. Florez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,379,173
of 14,122,411 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,173
of 5,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,695
of 281,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#104
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.