↓ Skip to main content

The impact of wall thickness and curvature on wall stress in patient-specific electromechanical models of the left atrium

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
The impact of wall thickness and curvature on wall stress in patient-specific electromechanical models of the left atrium
Published in
Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10237-019-01268-5
Authors

Christoph M. Augustin, Thomas E. Fastl, Aurel Neic, Chiara Bellini, John Whitaker, Ronak Rajani, Mark D. O’Neill, Martin J. Bishop, Gernot Plank, Steven A. Niederer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,823,917
of 14,163,256 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology
#119
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,966
of 300,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,163,256 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.