↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: A look back and to the future with classic papers in theoretical ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Ecology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Editorial: A look back and to the future with classic papers in theoretical ecology
Published in
Theoretical Ecology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12080-019-00439-5
Authors

Alan Hastings

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,400,004
of 14,098,451 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Ecology
#94
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,993
of 269,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Ecology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,098,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.