↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical word sense disambiguation with bidirectional long short-term memory and attention-based neural networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Biomedical word sense disambiguation with bidirectional long short-term memory and attention-based neural networks
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-3079-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Canlin Zhang, Daniel Biś, Xiuwen Liu, Zhe He

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,506,982
of 14,131,022 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,425
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,203
of 286,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#373
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,131,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.