↓ Skip to main content

Local variation in recombination rates of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) genome among samples from six disparate populations

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
Local variation in recombination rates of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) genome among samples from six disparate populations
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00040-019-00736-6
Authors

T. DeLory, K. Funderburk, K. Miller, W. Zuluaga-Smith, S. McPherson, C. W. Pirk, C. Costa, É. Weinstein-Teixeira, B. Dahle, O. Rueppell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,464,358
of 14,104,168 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#138
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,664
of 273,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,104,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.