| Title |
Low-level retention forestry, certification, and biodiversity: case Finland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Processes, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13717-019-0198-0 |
| Authors |
Timo Kuuluvainen, Henrik Lindberg, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa, Petri Keto-Tokoi, Pekka Punttila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 6 | 19% |
| Finland | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 18% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,004,342
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#10
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,060
of 482,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them