↓ Skip to main content

Trends in mathematical modeling of host–pathogen interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Trends in mathematical modeling of host–pathogen interactions
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00018-019-03382-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewald, Jan, Sieber, Patricia, Garde, Ravindra, Lang, Stefan N., Schuster, Stefan, Ibrahim, Bashar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,825,299
of 14,083,883 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences
#1,953
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,797
of 262,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.