↓ Skip to main content

Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of Ripasudil: a potential outcome marker for Trabeculotomy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of Ripasudil: a potential outcome marker for Trabeculotomy
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12886-019-1253-4
Authors

Erina Goda, Kazuyuki Hirooka, Kazuhiko Mori, Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,825,299
of 14,083,883 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#349
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,797
of 262,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#71
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.