@Mr_AlmondED De Jong: https://t.co/ZtDnasypMj Schnotz & Kurschner: https://t.co/kQfYVIeTv8 Leppink "Two Examples of Measurement Practice Leading Nowhere” https://t.co/hIEXUnPSh7 Sorry, not all open access.
Neuroscience, specifically cognitive load theory, applied to instructional design opens opportunities to increasing teaching and learning effectiveness https://t.co/ei0kT8yASU
@helenjwc @MichaelOllerton @RuthTrundley @geoffwake1 @thepetitioner @jaytimotheus @MrMattock @Ofstednews @NCETM @ATMMathematics @Mathematical_A @annemathswatson @easternmaths @KeepEYsUnique @CamillaKGilmore 3/4 For those who are interested, an Open Access
@marcxsmith @agittner @rjpritchard @robin_macp @colinsparkbridg As we would expect, aspects of CLT have been questioned by researchers. For those who are interested, here is an Open Access piece by one of them: https://t.co/aBa8hc8cxr
This 2010 article by de Jong outlines some issues with Cognitive Load Theory. https://t.co/xPUKuW1xfG
@impactology what you're describing sounds a little closer to cognitive load theory: https://t.co/UoER0RTG4L https://t.co/Wi0gFAU3y2
@Sue_Cowley https://t.co/yI8tFNv64s - covers important issues with the theory, one huge one being that although CLT specifically emphasises the importance of WM being *overloaded* the research looks at overall load. Thinking hard is reduced to 'germane loa
@neilmosley5 It's open access: https://t.co/LRssEzPhoJ
RT icpjones "RT spsmith45: For anyone who thinks cognitive load theory is clear-cut, this 2010 article by de Jong points out some serious issues. https://t.co/ngvLfAIBeM"
RT @spsmith45: For anyone who thinks cognitive load theory is clear-cut, this 2010 article by de Jong points out some serious issues. https…
For anyone who thinks cognitive load theory is clear-cut, this 2010 article by de Jong points out some serious issues. https://t.co/xPUKuW1xfG
RT icpjones "RT gianfrancocont9: An article highlighting some VERY important limitations of Cognitive Load Theory re the internal/external validity of the studies carried out in this line of research, e.g. many lab studies do not reflect typical teac… http
RT @gianfrancocont9: An article highlighting some VERY important limitations of Cognitive Load Theory re the internal/external validity of…
RT @gianfrancocont9: An article highlighting some VERY important limitations of Cognitive Load Theory re the internal/external validity of…
RT @gianfrancocont9: An article highlighting some VERY important limitations of Cognitive Load Theory re the internal/external validity of…
“The 3 main recommendations (of CLT) are: present material that aligns with the prior knowledge of the learner (intrinsic load), avoid non-essential/confusing information (extraneous load), & stimulate processes that lead to conceptually rich & dee
RT @gianfrancocont9: An article highlighting some VERY important limitations of Cognitive Load Theory re the internal/external validity of…
@matthewslocombe I think that's a fair point, but I'm not sure the take up of CLT by OFSTED and others is explained by the lack of serious and influential critiques. See for example Ton de Jong's open access paper in Instructional Science, which has 800+ c
@Stephen_Hurley @greg_ashman @mpershan @MatthewOldridge @NumCog @NumCogLab @tombennett71 @Maloney_EA @rebeccammerkley @mwalibali @SRaaijmakers Final one so all in one thread. Some critiques of certain aspects can be useful. Eg on CLT’s views on the testing
Children with working memory issues often struggle in the classroom. Cognitive load theory is a powerful framework for empowering teachers to reach every child. Read more about it here: https://t.co/yAwnQtQrzI
@dodiscimus @MissNeutrino @ollie_lovell @P_A_Kirschner Critiques, a lot still relevant IMO. De Jong: https://t.co/ZtDnasypMj Schnotz & Kurschner: https://t.co/Kf2ImpYhH9 Have fun! 😎
Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought | SpringerLink https://t.co/GSJnM7ivLj
Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought | SpringerLink https://t.co/GSJnM7ivLj
Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought | SpringerLink https://t.co/VOpczk8mJo
One can always rely on @cbokhove to cut through the nonsense :).
RT @cbokhove: @greg_ashman @IanPhillips2454 @warwickmansell There are lots of positive things. The less positive lies in many of the unreso…
@greg_ashman @IanPhillips2454 @warwickmansell There are lots of positive things. The less positive lies in many of the unresolved issues De Jong already described https://t.co/ZtDnasypMj The link to Geary is not evidenced well. Sweller created an issue as
RT @gianfrancocont9: Not strictly about Language Learning: De Jong on Cognitive Load https://t.co/lIWntSEjqm
RT @gianfrancocont9: Not strictly about Language Learning: De Jong on Cognitive Load https://t.co/lIWntSEjqm
Interesting for its general explanations and also for the discussion of problems defining types of cognitive load.
RT @gianfrancocont9: Not strictly about Language Learning: De Jong on Cognitive Load https://t.co/lIWntSEjqm
RT @katieirenec: Currently reading and enjoying "Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thoug…
Currently reading and enjoying "Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought" by Ton de Jong. Nice summary of criticisms of cognitive load theory. Open access! https://t.co/ljNfAsIIfl
RT @cbokhove: @C_Hendrick @ChrisMWParsons Also see De Jong (2010) https://t.co/htbgPIRn3n and with Karpicke https://t.co/9dFKDNZygR
@C_Hendrick @ChrisMWParsons Also see De Jong (2010) https://t.co/htbgPIRn3n and with Karpicke https://t.co/9dFKDNZygR
#FoodForThought "Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design " https://t.co/Nfpy8ZgeCR https://t.co/Wgff9GD9OS
(open access) Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought http://t.co/MTKnf9i1