↓ Skip to main content

Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-6327-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel V. Purcell, Sebastian Schmeier, Yee Chen Lau, John F. Pearson, Francis A. Frizelle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,663,856
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,036
of 8,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,896
of 459,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#58
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.