↓ Skip to main content

F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals
Published in
Scientometrics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03302-w
Authors

Peiling Wang, Joshua Williams, Nan Zhang, Qiang Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,877,600
of 15,519,772 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,402
of 1,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,501
of 358,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#36
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,519,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.