| Title |
Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: a position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05866-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexis Tabah, Matteo Bassetti, Marin H. Kollef, Jean-Ralph Zahar, José-Artur Paiva, Jean-Francois Timsit, Jason A. Roberts, Jeroen Schouten, Helen Giamarellou, Jordi Rello, Jan De Waele, Andrew F. Shorr, Marc Leone, Garyphallia Poulakou, Pieter Depuydt, Jose Garnacho-Montero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 32 | 11% |
| United States | 29 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Mexico | 11 | 4% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 20% |
| Unknown | 119 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 210 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 52 | 18% |
| Scientists | 29 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 53 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#224,504
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#167
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,145
of 479,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.