↓ Skip to main content

Stoichiometry constraints challenge the potential of agroecological practices for the soil C storage. A review

Overview of attention for article published in Agronomy for Sustainable Development, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Stoichiometry constraints challenge the potential of agroecological practices for the soil C storage. A review
Published in
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13593-019-0599-6
Authors

Isabelle Bertrand, Valérie Viaud, Tanguy Daufresne, Sylvain Pellerin, Sylvie Recous

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,448,934
of 14,076,258 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#133
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,999
of 263,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,076,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them