↓ Skip to main content

Ginseng-derived nanoparticles alter macrophage polarization to inhibit melanoma growth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
Title
Ginseng-derived nanoparticles alter macrophage polarization to inhibit melanoma growth
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-019-0817-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng Cao, Huaijiang Yan, Xuan Han, Ling Weng, Qin Wei, Xiaoyan Sun, Wuguang Lu, Qingyun Wei, Juan Ye, Xueting Cai, Chunping Hu, Xiaoyang Yin, Peng Cao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,090,718
of 14,123,595 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#622
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,896
of 290,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#224
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,123,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.