↓ Skip to main content

An empirical catalog of code smells for the presentation layer of Android apps

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
An empirical catalog of code smells for the presentation layer of Android apps
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10664-019-09768-9
Authors

Suelen Goularte Carvalho, Maurício Aniche, Júlio Veríssimo, Rafael S. Durelli, Marco Aurélio Gerosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,350,860
of 14,067,552 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#218
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,192
of 261,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,067,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.