Title |
Intra-aortic balloon pump does not influence cerebral hemodynamics and neurological outcomes in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an analysis of the IABCS trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0602-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliana R. Caldas, Ronney B. Panerai, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Graziela S. R. Ferreira, Ligia Camara, Rogério H. Passos, Angela M. Salinet, Daniel S. Azevedo, Marcelo de-Lima-Oliveira, Filomena R. B. G. Galas, Julia T. Fukushima, Ricardo Nogueira, Fabio S. Taccone, Giovanni Landoni, Juliano P. Almeida, Thompson G. Robinson, Ludhmila A. Hajjar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 37% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,629,346
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#813
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,302
of 475,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.