↓ Skip to main content

Intra-aortic balloon pump does not influence cerebral hemodynamics and neurological outcomes in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an analysis of the IABCS trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Intra-aortic balloon pump does not influence cerebral hemodynamics and neurological outcomes in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an analysis of the IABCS trial
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0602-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana R. Caldas, Ronney B. Panerai, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Graziela S. R. Ferreira, Ligia Camara, Rogério H. Passos, Angela M. Salinet, Daniel S. Azevedo, Marcelo de-Lima-Oliveira, Filomena R. B. G. Galas, Julia T. Fukushima, Ricardo Nogueira, Fabio S. Taccone, Giovanni Landoni, Juliano P. Almeida, Thompson G. Robinson, Ludhmila A. Hajjar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Psychology 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#11,250,786
of 18,862,116 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#591
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,440
of 414,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#75
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,862,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.