↓ Skip to main content

Pleural effusion as an atypical presentation of Kawasaki disease: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
Title
Pleural effusion as an atypical presentation of Kawasaki disease: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13256-019-2284-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elif Arslanoglu Aydin, Selcan Demir, Orkun Aydin, Yelda Bilginer, Seza Ozen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,307,090
of 14,143,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#181
of 2,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,264
of 298,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#17
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,143,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.