↓ Skip to main content

Systematic and meta-analytic analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations of bone health in youth with obesity: from methodological considerations to clinical relevance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Systematic and meta-analytic analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations of bone health in youth with obesity: from methodological considerations to clinical relevance
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00774-019-01015-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Thivel, D. Courteix, E. Chaplais, B. Pereira

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,153,143
of 14,064,239 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism
#316
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,826
of 260,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Metabolism
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.