↓ Skip to main content

Wage discrimination over the business cycle

Overview of attention for article published in IZA Journal of Labor Policy          , July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Wage discrimination over the business cycle
Published in
IZA Journal of Labor Policy          , July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-9004-2-7
Authors

Jeff E Biddle, Daniel S Hamermesh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 41%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,189,875
of 13,924,814 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Policy         
#46
of 90 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,790
of 177,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Policy         
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,924,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them