↓ Skip to main content

How developers engage with static analysis tools in different contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
How developers engage with static analysis tools in different contexts
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10664-019-09750-5
Authors

Carmine Vassallo, Sebastiano Panichella, Fabio Palomba, Sebastian Proksch, Harald C. Gall, Andy Zaidman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,541,556
of 14,064,239 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#114
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,032
of 260,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.