↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of intervertebral disc using T2 mapping sequences in patients undergoing O2–O3 chemiodiscolysis: an instrumental study with clinical correlation

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Evaluation of intervertebral disc using T2 mapping sequences in patients undergoing O2–O3 chemiodiscolysis: an instrumental study with clinical correlation
Published in
Neuroradiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00234-019-02308-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Bruno, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Emanuele Tommasino, Giampaolo Bianchi, Marco Varrassi, Francesco Arrigoni, Antonio Barile, Ernesto Di Cesare, Carlo Masciocchi, Alessandra Splendiani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,811,751
of 14,064,239 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#380
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,806
of 260,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.