↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptomic characterization of culture-associated changes in murine and human precision-cut tissue slices

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Transcriptomic characterization of culture-associated changes in murine and human precision-cut tissue slices
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00204-019-02611-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Bigaeva, Emilia Gore, Eric Simon, Matthias Zwick, Anouk Oldenburger, Koert P. de Jong, Hendrik S. Hofker, Marco Schlepütz, Paul Nicklin, Miriam Boersema, Jörg F. Rippmann, Peter Olinga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,811,745
of 14,064,239 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,505
of 1,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,601
of 261,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.