How Reliable Are Therapeutic Competence Ratings? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, November 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 4 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 31 Mendeley

Summary X

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 4 X users, with an upper bound of 16,475 followers.

RT @ChrisWebbPhD: How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings? New meta-analysis reveals a pooled ICC=.82 for inter-rater reliability (…

24 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ChrisWebbPhD: How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings? New meta-analysis reveals a pooled ICC=.82 for inter-rater reliability (…

24 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @ChrisWebbPhD: How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings? New meta-analysis reveals a pooled ICC=.82 for inter-rater reliability (…

24 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings? New meta-analysis reveals a pooled ICC=.82 for inter-rater reliability (but at the same time substantial heterogeneity in reliability across studies). https://t.co/4hYHQHPeBj

24 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite