↓ Skip to main content

A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Science Reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing
Published in
Fire Science Reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-0414-2-1
Authors

Luke Bisby, John Gales, Cristián Maluk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 124 63%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Materials Science 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Fire Science Reviews
#14
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,203
of 208,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them